rmp-logormp-logormp-logormp-logo
  • Why RMP
  • Who we work with
  • Resources
  • Insights
  • People
  • Get in touch
  • Risk Portal
Published by FP Admin on August 22, 2019
Categories
  • Casualty
  • Claims
  • Education
  • Local government
  • Resources
  • RMP Risk Control
  • Third sector
Tags
  • Casualty

Tree root claims

Home > Tree root claims

Relatively dry winters followed by warm, dry summers, reminiscent of 1976, 1992 and 2006 have led to a dramatic increase in tree root claims activity.

Such climatic conditions are likely to be repeated more often in the future as we progress into the age of global warming. How should local authorities prepare for this eventuality?

For some time now the law on tree root liabilities has been settled. In short, the owner (or controller) of a tree whose roots can be shown to have encroached on neighbouring land and/or has drawn sub-soil moisture affecting property, is liable to the owner of that property for the resultant damage.

The main reason for this almost strict liability is because claims are usually brought in nuisance rather than negligence. Many of the defences available to actions in negligence are simply not available when it comes to the tort of nuisance. However, there are several salient points to note:

  • The right of action rests solely with the owner of the affected property.
  • That right of action may not pass to subsequent owners unless the nuisance and damage is on-going.
  • The defending local authority does not need to own the tree to be liable in nuisance. If the LA have control over the maintenance of the tree, that is sufficient to create a right of action against them. [Jones v Portsmouth CA (2002)]
  • If the tree roots are the ‘substantial and effective cause’ of damage then the LA may be wholly liable for the damage to property. [Paterson v Humberside (1995)] & [Loftus-Brigham v Ealing CA (2003)]
  • The damage must be foreseeable. If the soil type and conditions are not normally associated with shrinkage and there is no locality history of problems, then there is a possible defence. It is believed that if such a defence is to be sustained, the LA will probably have to demonstrate a pro-active tree inspection and maintenance programme.
  • The ‘damage’ does not have to be physical. If the tree roots are still present and extracting moisture then there could be damage to the ‘load bearing qualities of residential land’. [Delaware Mansions HL (2001)]
  • The defendant LA is entitled to rely on notice of the nuisance (and damage) and to have the ‘reasonable opportunity for abatement before liability for remedial expenditure can arise’. [Delaware Mansions]
  • But the LA must act promptly once given notice of damage. [Jones v Portsmouth]
  • Formal notice is not always necessary. The LA may be deemed to be on notice bearing in mind all of the circumstances. [Kirk v Brent CA (2005)]

Despite what is said above and notwithstanding the apparent strict liability, there are a number of defences available.

  • Whilst the LA tree may be encroaching and drawing soil moisture, the main or ‘substantial and effective’ cause may be from other trees in the vicinity, not in ownership or control of the LA.
  • Foreseeability. Although, strictly speaking an available defence, it is questionable whether this has any practical value for a local authority. It is perhaps more appropriate in situations where the offending tree is in private ownership and where the individual does not have the same level of knowledge or experience as a LA who employs trained and qualified  arboriculturalists.
  • Although not a defence in law, tree pruning or pollarding at an early stage may abate the nuisance and mitigate or avoid a claim.
  • Failure to give notice. The onus is upon the claimants to give notice when they become aware of the problem and before any repair work is carried out. An absence of evidence may provide the LA with a practical defence.
  • Limitation. The period is 6 years from the date of damage. If the property has changed hands in that period, the new owner may not have any right of action for damage caused before ownership was acquired.

In the final analysis very few claims where causation is established are capable of defending. At best, efficient claims handling may mitigate the claims cost.

A lack of diligent claims handling (perhaps where claims have been handled in-house and without the involvement of expert evidence and assistance) has resulted in many properties being repaired/reinstated to a higher standard.

This degree of betterment is not recoverable in law. The legal principle of indemnity still applies, but many first party loss building insurers will cover this element in their initial claim.

Where a liability for loss is established, most local authorities have agreed (sometimes with a degree of reluctance) to remove the tree or undertake a programme of pruning and pollarding. However, there is a sea change taking place in the attitude and approach of many local authorities.

Perhaps it stems from an acceptance that the perceived imbalance of the law will not change in the foreseeable future or a greater importance placed on environmental issues, but simple tree removal is not always the first or obvious solution to a tree root damage problem.

Many local authorities are realising that trees in ‘public ownership’ are an asset upon which an intrinsic value can be placed. As a result trees in public places are subject to asset management schemes and registers. Thus the ‘value’ of a mature tree can be taken into account when deciding upon the solution to a tree root problem. Substantial underpinning coupled with the construction of a root barrier may, for example, be a more cost effective answer than simple tree removal or severe pollarding.

This approach, however, is largely dependant upon dialogue and discussion between local authorities and property insurers. All too often first notification of a subrogated claim sets in motion an adversarial stance and attitude on both sides. Whatever the future holds, effective claims management is the obvious solution to the immediate problems. The correct and diligent use of experts can save substantial costs to a local authority, by way of seeking a cost effective solution to the tree root issue and to avoid betterment situations which are included in subrogated claims from property insurers.

Property damage claims usually have a lower value than one might imagine, with the average cost being circa £4,000–5,000 (records kept by individual insurers may differ). The fees of experts are often modest given the potential savings if a cost effective remedy can found.

Ideally, local authorities, wherever possible, should adopt a pro-active rather than reactive approach to the problem. Certain types of tree have a propensity to cause such problems and careful planning in new development areas could well have a positive impact in years to come.

The problem is unlikely to resolve itself, nor is there any realistic prospect of a significant change in the law in the immediate or near future. Local authorities ignore the consequences at their peril.

David Blythe

How can we help you?

For more advice on how we can help lower the cost of your risk, please email contact@rmpartners.co.uk

Unsubscribe

You can opt out of marketing communications at any time by contacting us.

Download Resource

Download the Tree root claims PDF

Related Resources

Dogs in Schools...

Skateparks – A Guide for Local Authorities...

Judicial College Guidelines Update – March 2024...

Street Lighting Advice for Local Authorities...

Risk Assessment – Suitable and Sufficient?...

Office Chairs and Fire Safety...

Lighting for Car Parks...

Aggregate stop loss protection...

Cycling to and at work...

Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)...

Autonomous Vehicles: Ethical Decisions and the Impact o...

The RAPP Tool...

Free Running...

Laser Safety in Higher Education...

Bodycams in Higher Education – Better Safety...

Solar Panel Installations...

Safety in Managing Street Works – Chapter 8...

Taking Pride in Zebra Crossings...

The American XL Bully...

Market (Injury) Claims Update & Impact of the Whip...

Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education...

Dangers from Cobalt in Lithium-ion Battery Fires...

Martyn’s Law – The Protect Duty – A C...

Volunteers – Risk Management Guidance...

Police Vehicles – Use of Bait and Entrapment Vehicles...

Industry Highlights – October 2023...

Bike Pool Schemes...

Managing Choking Risk...

Managing Manual Handling...

Manual Handling: MAC Tool...

Martyn’s Law – The Protect Duty – A C...

Driving and the Menopause...

Risk Management for Public Events...

Bullying, Harassment and Discrimination...

EV Safety Guidance...

What does the energy crisis mean for public spaces?...

Managing Agency Drivers...

General Safety Regulations 2024...

Section 114 Notices...

ESG – Higher Education...

Managing Roofs in Higher Education...

E-Cargo Bikes...

Whistleblowing and Safeguarding – Higher Educatio...

Business continuity management...

BT Redcare Closure...

ESG...

Staying ready – an insight into health and safety regul...

Bite Size Virtual Training Programme – Casualty Risk Q3...

Bite Size Virtual Training Programme – Fleet Risk Manag...

Bonfires & Fireworks Displays – Higher Education...

Managing the Highways...

Whistleblowing and Safeguarding...

Student Suicide Awareness and Management...

Slips, Trips & Falls Toolkit – Winter Weathe...

RMP Risk Control – Public Sector State of the Nation Re...

Protecting Buildings from Vehicle Attacks...

Asbestos Management in Higher Education...

Managing the Risks from Diabetes...

Assurance Reporting in Higher Education...

Claims Cost Inflation...

RMP Risk Control – Formula Student...

The Rise of Artificial Intelligence...

Slips, Trips & Falls Toolkit – Risk Insight...

Managing Risks associated with Swimming Pools in Educat...

Managing Sleep Debt...

Unoccupied Premises...

Work Experience Placements...

RMP Risk Control – Permit-to-work management...

Wheel Security...

Seat Belt Buckle Guards...

RMP Risk Control – Thermal comfort at work...

Research Projects which need to be referred to RMP / HD...

Slips, Trips & Falls Toolkit – Contamination...

RMP Risk Control – Supervised and Unsupervised Gyms...

Slips, Trips & Falls Toolkit – Incident Inve...

Managing risks associated with online vehicle booking s...

Slips, Trips & Falls Toolkit – Human Factors...

Slips, Trips & Falls Toolkit – Slip Resistan...

Managing Graduations...

Joint Venture Risks...

Mould in Landlord Controlled Properties...

RMP Risk Control – Preventing Falls from Windows...

Slips, Trips & Falls Toolkit – Cleaning Regi...

Broker Bulletin No. 19 – Police vehicles – drivin...

Bite Size Virtual Training Programme – Fleet and Driver...

Bite Size Virtual Training Programme – Casualty Risk...

Slips, Trips & Falls Toolkit – Flooring, Cle...

Slips, Trips & Falls Toolkit – Entrances...

New and Expectant Mothers at Work and Study...

Summer Driving...

Assistance Dogs, Service Dogs and Puppy Therapy...

Working at Height Toolkit – Fall Restraint...

Bite Size Virtual Training Programme – Casualty R...

Employees Domiciled Abroad – Higher Education...

Slips, Trips & Falls Toolkit – Stairs &...

Slips, Trips & Falls Toolkit – Managing Trip...

Risk Management Health Check...

Employees Domiciled Abroad...

Whiplash Reforms Update – August 2023...

Personal Data Breaches in Higher Education...

Slips, Trips & Falls Toolkit – Footwear...

Lanyards While Driving...

Working at Height Toolkit – Fall Arrest...

Community Speed Watch...

IICSA: The End of Limitation?...

Working at Height Toolkit – Scaffolding...

Introduction to Essentials for Enterprise Risk Manageme...

Bite Size Virtual Training Programme – Fleet ...

Essentials for Enterprise Risk Management (EERM) in Hig...

Working at Height Toolkit – Introduction...

Personal Data Breaches in Public Sector...

Working at Height Toolkit – Fall Protection...

Working at Height Toolkit – Fragile Roofs and Sur...

Managing Woodland Visitors...

Martyn’s Law – The Protect Duty Legislation...

E-Bikes and E-Scooters – The Perils of Lithium-io...

IICSA: The Proposal of a National Redress Scheme for En...

Key Control: how good is your key security?...

Managing Risks Associated with Refuse Vehicles...

IICSA: An Analysis of Recommendation 6 of the Final Rep...

Ergonomics and Display Screen Equipment Use...

Ash Dieback...

The Ups and Downs of Trampoline Parks...

Vaping and the Workplace...

Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse Final Repor...

An Analysis of the Mandatory Reporting Requirement prop...

Motor Vehicle Insurance – Use by volunteers of th...

Forest School...

20’s Plenty...

Refuse Collections...

County Lines Drug Running...

Broker Bulletin No. 1 – Defibrillators...

Parkruns...

Well Managed Highways Infrastructure Code of Practice...

Safe Systems of Work – Safe Use of Ladders and St...

E-Scooters...

Competency of Structures Inspectors...

Ice on the Road...

Blue Light Trauma Awareness and Management...

Cycling Events...

Managing Grass Cutting: A Case Study...

Risk Information & Intelligence...

Risks in Outsourcing...

Broker Bulletin No. 17 – Looked After Children an...

Contract Works Cover and Cover for Existing Structures ...

Broker Bulletin No. 18 – Contract Works and Conti...

Fraud...

Highway Code Changes...

Highways Competency Framework...

Firework Risk Management Questionnaire...

Stress Management for Homeworkers...

Managing Inland Open Water (including Ice)...

Bonfires and Fireworks Displays...

Cyber Attacks...

W-8BEN-E – FATCA AIG Europe Limited...

RMP Tenders – Information Required for Quotations...

Social Engineering and Deepfakes...

Contractors Training & Discussion Workshop...

Play – The Universal Language of Children...

Towing Legislation...

Social media: the good, the bad and the ugly...

Stress Risk Management for Emergency Services...

Fireworks – Planning a safe display...

Not My Responsibility...

E-Scooters on Higher Education Campuses...

Automated and Electric Vehicles...

Construction Design and Management (CDM) – The Es...

Employment Relations (Flexible Working) Act 2023...

Managing Risks associated with Grey Fleet Vehicles...

Electronic Signatures...

Drones and Model Aeroplanes...

Managing Drivers with Diabetes...

Display Screen Equipment...

Social Engineering...

Electrical Safety...

Children and Young People within a Higher Education Wor...

Home Food Preparation for Schools...

Safe Storage and Use of Vapes...

Misfuelling a Vehicle...

Inflatable Structures...

Managing Risks associated with Hand Arm Vibration Syndr...

W-8BEN-E – FATCA Ecclesiastical Insurance Office ...

Claims Handlers (Auditing)...

Managing Protests in Higher Education...

Students – Sports Injuries...

Keyless Vehicle Entry Systems – Relay Theft...

Virtual Tree Masterclass – Save The Date...

Broker Bulletin No. 3 – Insurance Act 2015...

W-8BEN-E – FATCA MS Amlin AG...

Combating Bed Bugs...

Operator Licence Changes...

Combating Bed Bugs – Higher Education...

Stress Risk Management – Higher Education...

W-8BEN-E – Underwriters at Lloyd’s London...

W-8IMY – FATCA Risk Management Partners Limited...

Managing First Aid...

Homeworking...

Waste Collection and Culture – Risk Management Gu...

Stress Risk Management...

Safe Storage and Use of Vapes – Higher Education...

The viability of care homes...

Managing First Aid – Higher Education...

Allergies & Risk of Anaphylaxis in Schools...

Children and young people within a Blue Light workplace...

Combined Liability – Decision Tree and Treatment ...

W-8BEN-E – FATCA Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Compan...

Proper Footwear...

Broker Bulletin No. 2 – Local Pension Boards ...

W-8BEN-E – FATCA HSB Engineering Insurance Limite...

Refuse Collection Operations Risk Management – Safety C...

Preventing slips on snow and ice...

Broker Bulletin No. 13 – Regional Adoption Agenci...

Broker Bulletin No. 5 – Employees Own Vehicles &#...

Storage of Hazardous Substances in Educational Establis...

W-8BEN-E – FATCA Starr International (Europe) Lim...

Dementia Awareness for Managers of Drivers...

Tree Safety – Managing the Risks...

Broker Bulletin No. 4 – Contract Works Cover ...

Controlling the casualty risks associated with unmanned...

W-8BEN-E – FATCA QBE Insurance (Europe) Limited...

Children’s Trusts...

How an underwriter sets a premium...

Shared Services – where are we now...

Social Media & Social Responsibility – Highe...

Contract Works Insurance...

Time for a Check Up...

Broker Bulletin No. 8 – Police Risks – Dete...

Broker Bulletin No. 11 – New PL & EL Policy ...

Preventing & Controlling Unauthorised Access to Ro...

Small events risk management...

Broker Bulletin No. 7 – POLICE Risks – Memo...

Broker Bulletin No. 9 – Police Risks – Nati...

Authority Business – Using Your Own Vehicle...

How to complete your renewal questionnaire...

Social Media & Social Responsibility...

Legionella – Risk Controls...

Sign up to receive the latest from rmp

    You can opt out of marketing communications at any time by contacting us

    Sign up to receive the latest from RMP

    For information on how we use your personal data please refer to our UK Privacy Notice | EEA Privacy Notice.

      You can opt out of marketing communications at any time by contacting us

      RMP

      • Classes of insurance
      • Resources
      • Why RMP
      • Insights
      • Get in touch

      Sectors

      • Local government
      • Police
      • Fire services
      • Education institutions

      Legal

      • Complaints
      • Cookie policy
      • Global privacy policy
      • Lloyd’s Brexit Transfer
      • Modern Slavery Agreement
      • Terms and conditions

      Follow Us

      • LinkedIn
      • Twitter

      © Risk Management Partners Ltd All rights reserved. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority number 313119. Registered in England number 2989025. The Walbrook Building, 25 Walbrook, London, EC4N 8AW