rmp-logormp-logormp-logormp-logo
  • Why RMP
  • Who we work with
  • Resources
  • Insights
  • People
  • Get in touch
  • RMP Europe
Published by Risk Management Partners on August 22, 2019
Categories
  • Casualty
  • Claims
  • Education
  • Local government
  • Resources
  • RMP Risk Control
  • Third sector
Tags
  • Casualty

Tree root claims

Home > Tree root claims

Relatively dry winters followed by warm, dry summers, reminiscent of 1976, 1992 and 2006 have led to a dramatic increase in tree root claims activity.

Such climatic conditions are likely to be repeated more often in the future as we progress into the age of global warming. How should local authorities prepare for this eventuality?

For some time now the law on tree root liabilities has been settled. In short, the owner (or controller) of a tree whose roots can be shown to have encroached on neighbouring land and/or has drawn sub-soil moisture affecting property, is liable to the owner of that property for the resultant damage.

The main reason for this almost strict liability is because claims are usually brought in nuisance rather than negligence. Many of the defences available to actions in negligence are simply not available when it comes to the tort of nuisance. However, there are several salient points to note:

  • The right of action rests solely with the owner of the affected property.
  • That right of action may not pass to subsequent owners unless the nuisance and damage is on-going.
  • The defending local authority does not need to own the tree to be liable in nuisance. If the LA have control over the maintenance of the tree, that is sufficient to create a right of action against them. [Jones v Portsmouth CA (2002)]
  • If the tree roots are the ‘substantial and effective cause’ of damage then the LA may be wholly liable for the damage to property. [Paterson v Humberside (1995)] & [Loftus-Brigham v Ealing CA (2003)]
  • The damage must be foreseeable. If the soil type and conditions are not normally associated with shrinkage and there is no locality history of problems, then there is a possible defence. It is believed that if such a defence is to be sustained, the LA will probably have to demonstrate a pro-active tree inspection and maintenance programme.
  • The ‘damage’ does not have to be physical. If the tree roots are still present and extracting moisture then there could be damage to the ‘load bearing qualities of residential land’. [Delaware Mansions HL (2001)]
  • The defendant LA is entitled to rely on notice of the nuisance (and damage) and to have the ‘reasonable opportunity for abatement before liability for remedial expenditure can arise’. [Delaware Mansions]
  • But the LA must act promptly once given notice of damage. [Jones v Portsmouth]
  • Formal notice is not always necessary. The LA may be deemed to be on notice bearing in mind all of the circumstances. [Kirk v Brent CA (2005)]

Despite what is said above and notwithstanding the apparent strict liability, there are a number of defences available.

  • Whilst the LA tree may be encroaching and drawing soil moisture, the main or ‘substantial and effective’ cause may be from other trees in the vicinity, not in ownership or control of the LA.
  • Foreseeability. Although, strictly speaking an available defence, it is questionable whether this has any practical value for a local authority. It is perhaps more appropriate in situations where the offending tree is in private ownership and where the individual does not have the same level of knowledge or experience as a LA who employs trained and qualified  arboriculturalists.
  • Although not a defence in law, tree pruning or pollarding at an early stage may abate the nuisance and mitigate or avoid a claim.
  • Failure to give notice. The onus is upon the claimants to give notice when they become aware of the problem and before any repair work is carried out. An absence of evidence may provide the LA with a practical defence.
  • Limitation. The period is 6 years from the date of damage. If the property has changed hands in that period, the new owner may not have any right of action for damage caused before ownership was acquired.

In the final analysis very few claims where causation is established are capable of defending. At best, efficient claims handling may mitigate the claims cost.

A lack of diligent claims handling (perhaps where claims have been handled in-house and without the involvement of expert evidence and assistance) has resulted in many properties being repaired/reinstated to a higher standard.

This degree of betterment is not recoverable in law. The legal principle of indemnity still applies, but many first party loss building insurers will cover this element in their initial claim.

Where a liability for loss is established, most local authorities have agreed (sometimes with a degree of reluctance) to remove the tree or undertake a programme of pruning and pollarding. However, there is a sea change taking place in the attitude and approach of many local authorities.

Perhaps it stems from an acceptance that the perceived imbalance of the law will not change in the foreseeable future or a greater importance placed on environmental issues, but simple tree removal is not always the first or obvious solution to a tree root damage problem.

Many local authorities are realising that trees in ‘public ownership’ are an asset upon which an intrinsic value can be placed. As a result trees in public places are subject to asset management schemes and registers. Thus the ‘value’ of a mature tree can be taken into account when deciding upon the solution to a tree root problem. Substantial underpinning coupled with the construction of a root barrier may, for example, be a more cost effective answer than simple tree removal or severe pollarding.

This approach, however, is largely dependant upon dialogue and discussion between local authorities and property insurers. All too often first notification of a subrogated claim sets in motion an adversarial stance and attitude on both sides. Whatever the future holds, effective claims management is the obvious solution to the immediate problems. The correct and diligent use of experts can save substantial costs to a local authority, by way of seeking a cost effective solution to the tree root issue and to avoid betterment situations which are included in subrogated claims from property insurers.

Property damage claims usually have a lower value than one might imagine, with the average cost being circa £4,000–5,000 (records kept by individual insurers may differ). The fees of experts are often modest given the potential savings if a cost effective remedy can found.

Ideally, local authorities, wherever possible, should adopt a pro-active rather than reactive approach to the problem. Certain types of tree have a propensity to cause such problems and careful planning in new development areas could well have a positive impact in years to come.

The problem is unlikely to resolve itself, nor is there any realistic prospect of a significant change in the law in the immediate or near future. Local authorities ignore the consequences at their peril.

David Blythe

How can we help you?

For more advice on how we can help lower the cost of your risk, please email contact@rmpartners.co.uk

Unsubscribe

You can opt out of marketing communications at any time by contacting us.

Download Resource

Download the Tree root claims PDF

Related Resources

Flammable Liquids...

Security – Intruder Alarms...

Risk Assessment – Suitable and Sufficient...

Cycling to and at work...

Aggregate stop loss protection...

Free Running...

Dogs in Schools...

Taking Pride in Zebra Crossings...

Office Chairs and Fire Safety...

Volunteers – Risk Management Guidance...

Lighting for Car Parks...

Maintaining Health and Wellbeing during COVID-19...

Managing risks associated with online vehicle booking s...

Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)...

Managing Risks associated with Swimming Pools in Educat...

Forest School...

Whiplash Reforms Update – May 2022...

Bite Size Virtual Training Programme – Fleet ...

Parkruns...

Social Care Resilience – Planning beyond the Pand...

Essentials of Enterprise Risk Management Virtual Course...

IOSH Managing Safely Virtual Courses – 2022...

Bite Size Virtual Training Programme – Casualty R...

County Lines Drug Running...

The Ups and Downs of Trampoline Parks...

Risk Control Refuse Booklet...

IOSH Managing Safely Refresher Virtual Courses – ...

The Road Ahead in 2022...

Competency of Structures Inspectors...

Bite Size Virtual Training Programme – HE HDI Cas...

Cycling Events...

IOSH Safety for Executives & Directors (SfED) Virt...

COVID-19 – Returning to the Workplace – Leg...

Lanyards While Driving...

Ice on the Road...

Blue Light Trauma Awareness and Management...

E-Scooters...

Procurement Risk Management Guide...

The 16th Edition of the Judicial College (JC) Guideline...

Fraud...

Ergonomics and Display Screen Equipment Use...

Skateparks – A Guide for Local Authorities...

Risks in Outsourcing...

Highway Code Changes...

Legislative Changes to Claims Handling, Impact and Mark...

Fleet Management Training...

Risk Management Health Check...

Contractors Training & Discussion Workshop...

Firework Risk Management Questionnaire...

The Great Unknown Unknowns – Risk Information �...

Not My Responsibility...

Towing Legislation...

Stress Management for Homeworkers...

Well Managed Highways Infrastructure Code of Practice...

Sandwich Panels...

Electronic Signatures...

Arson Control...

W-8BEN-E – FATCA AIG Europe Limited...

Inland Open Water – Risk Management Guidance...

Social Engineering...

Broker Bulletin No. 1 – Defibrillators...

Electrical Safety...

Virtual Tree Masterclass – Save The Date...

Alternatively Fuelled Vehicles...

Operator Licence Changes...

FM-200...

Display Screen Equipment...

Highways Competency Framework...

Ash Dieback...

Motor Vehicle Insurance – Use by volunteers of th...

RMP Tenders – Information Required for Quotations...

Portable and Transportable Space Heaters...

Risk Management for Public Events...

Play – The Universal Language of Children...

Home Food Preparation for Schools...

Stress...

Managing Drivers with Diabetes...

Automated and Electric Vehicles...

Managing Risks associated with Hand Arm Vibration Syndr...

Metal Halide Lighting...

Stress Risk Management for Emergency Services...

Social media: the good, the bad and the ugly...

Cyber risk at a glance...

Police Motor Fleets...

Electrical Fires – fixed electrical installations...

Inergen...

W-8BEN-E – Underwriters at Lloyd’s London...

Drones and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles...

Managing Risks associated with Grey Fleet Vehicles...

W-8IMY – FATCA Risk Management Partners Limited...

Homeworking...

Fireworks – Planning a safe display...

W-8BEN-E – FATCA MS Amlin AG...

Private Fire Hydrants...

Argonite...

Novec 1230...

W-8BEN-E – FATCA Ecclesiastical Insurance Office ...

Cyber Attacks...

Stress Risk Management...

Fire Safety – Flammable Gases...

Unstaffed Extended Opening Hours...

Winter Weather Precautions...

Keyless Vehicle Entry Systems – Relay Theft...

Broker Bulletin No. 2 – Local Pension Boards ...

Children and young people within a Blue Light workplace...

Smoking in the workplace...

The viability of care homes...

W-8BEN-E – FATCA HSB Engineering Insurance Limite...

Electrical Fires – Portable Electrical Appliances...

Inflatable Structures...

Dementia Awareness for Managers of Drivers...

Security – Metal Theft...

Allergies & Risk of Anaphylaxis in Schools...

Waste Collection and Culture Risk Management...

Security – Manned Guarding Services...

Higher Education Risk Profiling 2021...

W-8BEN-E – FATCA Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Compan...

Control of Contractors...

Claims Handlers (Auditing)...

Unwanted Fire Signals...

Kitchen Fires...

Broker Bulletin No. 3 – Insurance Act 2015...

W-8BEN-E – FATCA Starr International (Europe) Lim...

Broker Bulletin No. 5 – Employees Own Vehicles &#...

Freezers and Fridges...

Misfuelling a Vehicle...

Security – Understanding the Risk...

FISP Permit...

Hot Work – Understanding the Risks...

W-8BEN-E – FATCA QBE Insurance (Europe) Limited...

Broker Bulletin No. 4 – Contract Works Cover ...

Fire Brigade Strike...

Security – CCTV...

Broker Bulletin No. 13 – Regional Adoption Agenci...

Unoccupied Premises...

Risk Assessment and Self Inspection...

Proper Footwear for the Job...

Modular Construction on Educational Sites...

Children’s Trusts...

Refuse Collection Operations Risk Management – Safety C...

Emergency Organisation...

Combined Liability – Decision Tree and Treatment ...

Fork-Lift Trucks...

Heating up our Highways...

Preventing slips on snow and ice...

Cyber Risk Healthcheck...

Green Matters...

Gaseous Fire Suppression System...

Contract Works Insurance...

How an underwriter sets a premium...

Sprinkler Impairments...

Broker Bulletin No. 8 – Police Risks – Dete...

Civil Unrest...

Project Planning...

Time for a Check Up...

Environmental Risk Management...

Automatic Fire Detection...

Thermography...

Automatic Sprinklers...

Transient Overvoltage Protection...

Storage Fires...

Authority Business – Using Your Own Vehicle...

Controlling the casualty risks associated with unmanned...

Small events risk management...

How to complete your renewal questionnaire...

Security – Computer Equipment Protection...

Storage of Hazardous Substances in Educational Establis...

Broker Bulletin No. 7 – POLICE Risks – Memo...

Housing Fire Risk Management...

Preventing & Controlling Unauthorised Access to Ro...

Security – Money...

Broker Bulletin No. 11 – New PL & EL Policy ...

Social Media & Social Responsibility – Highe...

Lightning Protection...

Broker Bulletin No. 9 – Police Risks – Nati...

Shared Services – where are we now...

Automatic Sprinkler Systems – Winter Precautions...

Security – Physical Protections...

Legionella – Risk Controls...

Broker Bulletin No. 12 – RMP launches new Terrori...

Social Media & Social Responsibility...

Tree Safety – Managing the Risks...

Sign up to receive the latest from rmp

You can opt out of marketing communications at any time by contacting us

Sign up to receive the latest from RMP

For information on how we use your personal data please refer to our UK Privacy Notice | EEA Privacy Notice.

You can opt out of marketing communications at any time by contacting us

RMP

  • Classes of insurance
  • Resources
  • Why RMP
  • Insights
  • Get in touch

Sectors

  • Local government
  • Police
  • Fire services
  • Education institutions

Legal

  • Complaints
  • UK Privacy Notice
  • EEA Privacy Notice
  • Cookie policy
  • Terms and conditions
  • Lloyd’s Brexit Transfer

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

© Risk Management Partners Ltd All rights reserved. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority number 313119. Registered in England number 2989025. The Walbrook Building, 25 Walbrook, London, EC4N 8AW