In accordance with the latest UK government guidelines, all RMP colleagues are now working from home until further notice. Despite not being able to meet with you in person, we are very much open for business and you can reach all our teams by phone, email or social media as we continue our mission to deliver the best service possible for you and all of our clients.
Thank you for your understanding and support as we do our bit to help mitigate the risks associated with COVID-19 in these extraordinary times.
Take care and stay safe from all at RMP

rmp-logormp-logormp-logormp-logo
  • Why RMP
  • Who we work with
  • Resources
  • Insights
  • People
  • Get in touch
  • RMP Europe
Published by Risk Management Partners on August 15, 2019
Categories
  • Education
  • Fire
  • Local government
  • Police
  • Resources
  • Risk Control
  • RMP Risk Control
  • Third sector
Tags
  • Casualty

Risk Assessment - Suitable and Sufficient

Home > Risk Assessment – Suitable and Sufficient

Introduction

Every organisation needs to manage health and safety, and control any hazards to employees and others. The adequacy of controls are identified during a risk assessment and there is a duty to ensure the risk assessment is suitable and sufficient. Any adverse incident will draw attention to the risk assessment to ensure it is such. But what makes a risk assessment suitable and sufficient?

The phrase suitable and sufficient is not defined in any legislation but is defined by the Health and Safety Executive within INDG163 Risk assessment brief guide.

This guidance note is designed to clarify the issue of ensuring a risk assessment is suitable and sufficient, covering some of the underlying factors that should be taken into account when carrying out risk assessments.

Why a risk assessment may be suitable and sufficient

  • The person doing the assessment is not competent

Whilst this alone would not constitute that the risk assessment was not suitable and sufficient, someone who is not competent may fail to identify all relevant hazards or evaluate the risk etc. The person conducting the risk assessment must be competent to do so with the degree of competence dependent on what it is that is being assessed. The more complex the subject, the more competent the assessor should be. It is incumbent upon an employer to ensure that if employees are being asked to carry out risk assessments, they are competent.

The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) defines competence as a “combination of training, skills, experience, and knowledge that a person has and their ability to apply them to perform a task safely”. Additionally, they also suggest factors such as attitude and physical ability can affect someone’s competence.

  • A proper check of the hazards was not done

There is a requirement to identify any hazards and reasonably foreseeable risk which may result from the hazard not being controlled.

In its position paper Reducing Risks, Protecting People (R2P2) published in 2001, the HSE explains: “So as not to impose unnecessary burdens on duty holders, HSE will not expect them to take account of hazards other than those which are a reasonably foreseeable cause of harm, taking account of reasonably foreseeable events and behaviour.”

Part 6 of the Position Paper gives an example of a reasonably foreseeable event regarding the collapse of a building.

Therefore, you cannot do a safety risk assessment sitting at a desk. At some point you will need to record the findings, but to get the full picture you need to walk around the workplace and look for, and take note of what could cause harm – hazards. As you walk round, speak to employees and users and gather information from them on hazards which may not be obvious.

Take note of all issues found as you can discount them later if necessary. Also, if you find a hazard, record as much as you can about it. As an example, oxygen therapy cylinders are hazardous – they pose a risk of musculoskeletal injuries caused by poor manual handling, and a risk of fire and explosion caused by poor maintenance and management of the cylinder resulting in leaks and an enriched oxygen atmosphere. You should record the size of cylinder(s), how many are present, specific location and note any impact on other legislation i.e. under the RRFO or F(S)A, a review of the fire risk assessment will be required and a risk assessment may be required to comply with DSEAR.

Also, consider other factors which may have a bearing on the hazard being realised such as weather conditions throughout the year (if outdoors), peak times for workloads, annual leave impacts on workloads.

  • Don’t forget about the ‘Health’ hazard in Health and Safety

When we talk about health and safety it is easier to foresee a personal injury incident. More difficult, and sometimes overlooked, is the ‘Health’ part – someone suffering from a work related illness caused by exposure to harmful materials. These are normally, but not always, latent illness i.e. prolonged exposure to a substance may cause dermatitis in the future. An example would be a mechanic carrying out vehicle maintenance and repairs being exposed to used engine oils or exhaust fumes over a number of years, known carcinogens.

Compared to accidents, work-related health problems cause far more absence. HSE statistics for 2019 showed that there were 23.5 million work related ill-health working days lost compared to 4.7 million due to non-fatal workplace injuries.

  • You failed to consult or identify those who might be affected

This is not ‘everyone’. It must be categorised into the different exposure types i.e. employee, visitors, member of public, contactor, volunteers resident etc., including approximate numbers of each category. Each category may require different control measures.

Consider if there is anyone especially at risk including children, elderly, lone workers, people with impairments etc. Again, there may be a need for specific controls measures.

  • You failed to deal with all the obvious significant hazards

The HSE do not provide a general definition of ‘significant hazard’ or ‘significant risk’ however, these can be referenced elsewhere. The Quarries Regulations 1999 Approved Code of Practice, paragraph 295 indicates:

‘The hazard should be considered significant if such a failure would, directly or indirectly, be:

(a) …; or
(b) likely to kill or seriously injure anyone.’

Within the Glossary to the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 Guidance on Regulations, reference is made to ‘significant risks’ as being:

‘not necessarily those that involve the greatest risks, but those (including health risks) that are not likely to be obvious, are unusual, or likely to be difficult to manage effectively.’

In dealing with the most significant hazards, you need to implement controls taking account of the number of people who could be involved. Hence recording the approximate numbers for each category at risk of harm. Involve users, employees, and employee representatives, investigate what controls are currently in use and if these are effective and practicable.

Control measures (precautions) must be reasonably practicable and follow the principles of prevention (see the Management Regs). For some specific legislation such as COSHH, the hierarchy of control will need to be considered.

Reasonably practicable requires judgement. It is the balance between the cost, time, and effort to implement the control, weighed against the benefit that the control brings. The ethos is linked to the principles of prevention. As an example, the principles of prevention begin with elimination; is it reasonable for you to eliminate the hazard? If not, it may not be reasonably practicable. What is reasonable is also measured by what a similar person would do in the same circumstance given the same information.

  • You failed to ensure the remaining risk is low

When you evaluate the risk, given all the information gathered during observation and research, you need to ensure that you have reduced the risk to a level which is as low as reasonably practicable, sometimes referred to as ALARP. This again is linked to the concept of reasonably practicable and the hierarchy of control. Can we evidence that you have done everything reasonably practicable to reduce the risk? Have you met or exceeded any industrial standards, best practice guides etc.?

Other failures in risk assessment

They are treated as a paper exercise

Many people see risk assessment and health and safety as ‘bolt-ons’ to their normal work tasks but it is inherent in everything you and your staff do. It is not just a compliance issue or paper exercise. The findings must be acted upon to produce a real improvement in health and safety at work. The controls listed in an assessment are things that your staff are working to every day – wearing PPE, following a safe work method or procedure, implementing knowledge gained on training course(s), providing supervision. Consider it as a positive aspect of ensuring you achieve your outcomes safely with a motivated workforce.

They are not monitored for effectiveness nor reviewed periodically

The employer has a legal duty to review a risk assessment periodically to ensure it is current. There is no defined period as to when this should happen, however this must be related to the risk. Not all risk assessments have a scoring matrix, and if you look at the HSE examples these do not have a scoring matrix either.

With an initial risk assessment, you will want to be informed if the controls are effective and you need to monitor and review it at frequent intervals. If you suspect it is no longer valid then it must be reviewed. New equipment, processes, personnel, new locations, alterations to premises and workplace layouts, and enforcement letters are some matters that will require a review.

Reviewing does not necessarily mean repeating the whole process. If the existing controls in place are still considered adequate, just make a record of that.

Using an off-the-shelf (OTS) product

Given that the HSE have example risk assessments on their website, it would seem OK to use an OTS product, and why ‘reinvent the wheel’. But beware – the risk assessment is yours not the HSE’s or anyone else’s that you have sourced it from. If you are tempted to use an OTS assessment you MUST check that it is valid. You still have a legal duty to ensure it identifies all significant hazards – the only way you can do that is to observe your workplace.

Not telling employees about the findings

Employers must provide employees and others with information on the risks in the workplace and how they are protected.

In many circumstances, the provision of information, instruction, and training will be part of your control measures.

Conclusions

There are numerous benefits to ensuring your risk assessments are suitable and sufficient.

  • A safer workplace
  • Improved staff morale
  • Positive safety culture
  • Reduction in incidents/reduced downtime/cost savings
  • Improved relationships with stakeholders/ regulators
  • Reduced civil claims and costs
  • Compliance with legal obligations

Risk assessments don’t have to be complicated but need to be reflective of the practices that are employed to ensure employees and others are safe.

Controls need to be reasonable and proportionate to the environment in which they are carried out.

Health and safety will not stop you doing your work but it will help you to work safely.

How can we help you?

For more advice on how we can help lower the cost of your risk, please email contact@rmpartners.co.uk

Unsubscribe

You can opt out of marketing communications at any time by contacting us.

Download Resource

Download the Risk Assessment - Suitable and Sufficient PDF

Related Resources

Security – Intruder Alarms...

Flammable Liquids...

Free Running...

Arson Control...

Tree root claims...

Cycling to and at work...

Aggregate stop loss protection...

Maintaining Health and Wellbeing during COVID-19...

IOSH Managing Safely Virtual Courses – June &...

Volunteers – Risk Management Guidance...

Social Care Resilience...

Cycling Events...

Lighting for Car Parks...

Parkruns...

IOSH Managing Safely Virtual Courses – May &...

Dogs in Schools...

Taking Pride in Zebra Crossings...

Essentials of Enterprise Risk Management – IRM Ac...

IOSH Safety for Executives & Directors (SfED) Virt...

IOSH Managing Safely Virtual Courses – February &...

Ice on the Road...

Blue Light Trauma Awareness and Management...

Competency of Structures Inspectors...

Bite Size Virtual Training Programme – Casualty R...

Bite Size Virtual Training Programme – HE HDI Cas...

Bite Size Virtual Training Programme – EL & ...

Risk Control Refuse Booklet...

Bite Size Virtual Training Programme – Fleet ...

COVID-19 Risk Assessment Guidance – Offices...

Lanyards While Driving...

COVID-19 Risk Management Checklist – Offices...

Fraud...

COVID-19 – Returning to the Workplace...

COVID-19 Risk Management Checklist – Working in or from...

COVID-19 – Returning to the Workplace – Leg...

COVID-19 Risk Management Guidance – Education Settings...

Managing Risks associated with Swimming Pools in Educat...

Managing risks associated with online vehicle booking s...

Firework Risk Management Questionnaire...

The Ups and Downs of Trampoline Parks...

County Lines Drug Running...

Risks in Outsourcing...

Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)...

Sandwich Panels...

E-Scooters...

Ergonomics and Display Screen Equipment Use...

W-8BEN-E – FATCA AIG Europe Limited...

Portable and Transportable Space Heaters...

Stress...

Skateparks – A Guide for Local Authorities...

RMP Tenders – Information Required for Quotations...

Home Food Preparation for Schools...

Police Motor Fleets...

FM-200...

Metal Halide Lighting...

Managing Drivers with Diabetes...

Ash Dieback...

Inergen...

Private Fire Hydrants...

Managing Risks associated with Grey Fleet Vehicles...

Play – The Universal Language of Children...

Homeworking...

Stress Risk Management for Emergency Services...

Well Managed Highways Infrastructure Code of Practice...

Stress Risk Management...

W-8BEN-E – Underwriters at Lloyd’s London...

W-8IMY – FATCA Risk Management Partners Limited...

Highways Competency Framework...

Dementia Awareness for Managers of Drivers...

Electrical Fires – fixed electrical installations...

Managing Risks associated with Hand Arm Vibration Syndr...

Children and young people within a Blue Light workplace...

Cyber risk at a glance...

Cyber Attacks...

Automated & Electric Vehicles Briefing 2020...

W-8BEN-E – FATCA MS Amlin AG...

Keyless Vehicle Entry Systems – Relay Theft...

Fire Safety – Flammable Gases...

Winter Weather Precautions...

Argonite...

Security – Metal Theft...

Smoking in the workplace...

Fireworks – Planning a safe display...

W-8BEN-E – FATCA HSB Engineering Insurance Limite...

Control of Contractors...

Electrical Fires – Portable Electrical Appliances...

FISP Permit...

Novec 1230...

Motor Vehicle Insurance – Use by volunteers of th...

Risk Management Health Check...

W-8BEN-E – FATCA Ecclesiastical Insurance Office ...

The viability of care homes...

Broker Bulletin No. 2 – Local Pension Boards ...

W-8BEN-E – FATCA Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Compan...

Broker Bulletin No. 3 – Insurance Act 2015...

Kitchen Fires...

Security – Manned Guarding Services...

Unwanted Fire Signals...

Broker Bulletin No. 1 – Defibrillators...

W-8BEN-E – FATCA Starr International (Europe) Lim...

Broker Bulletin No. 5 – Employees Own Vehicles &#...

Claims Handlers (Auditing)...

Inflatable Structures...

Fire Brigade Strike...

Misfuelling a Vehicle...

Freezers and Fridges...

Unstaffed Extended Opening Hours...

Broker Bulletin No. 13 – Regional Adoption Agenci...

Highways – Responding to the Crisis...

Drones and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles...

Security – Understanding the Risk...

Security – CCTV...

Children’s Trusts...

Heating up our Highways...

Risk Management for Public Events...

W-8BEN-E – FATCA QBE Insurance (Europe) Limited...

Unoccupied Premises...

Fork-Lift Trucks...

Hot Work – Understanding the Risks...

Broker Bulletin No. 4 – Contract Works Cover ...

Waste Collection and Culture Risk Management...

Cyber Risk Healthcheck...

Combined Liability – Decision Tree and Treatment ...

Proper Footwear for the Job...

Broker Bulletin No. 8 – Police Risks – Dete...

Project Planning...

Green Matters...

Contract Works Insurance...

How an underwriter sets a premium...

Sprinkler Impairments...

Time for a Check Up...

Environmental Risk Management...

Refuse Collection Operations Risk Management – Safety C...

Storage Fires...

Gaseous Fire Suppression System...

Preventing slips on snow and ice...

Modular Construction on Educational Sites...

Automatic Sprinklers...

Thermography...

Inland Open Water – Risk Management Guidance...

Authority Business – Using Your Own Vehicle...

Civil Unrest...

How to complete your renewal questionnaire...

Allergies & Risk of Anaphylaxis in Schools...

Automatic Fire Detection...

Controlling the casualty risks associated with unmanned...

Broker Bulletin No. 7 – POLICE Risks – Memo...

Lightning Protection...

Broker Bulletin No. 9 – Police Risks – Nati...

Security – Computer Equipment Protection...

Transient Overvoltage Protection...

Storage of Hazardous Substances in Educational Establis...

Security – Money...

Broker Bulletin No. 11 – New PL & EL Policy ...

Preventing & Controlling Unauthorised Access to Ro...

Shared Services – where are we now...

Housing Fire Risk Management...

Small events risk management...

Arson Control...

Automatic Sprinkler Systems – Winter Precautions...

Social Media & Social Responsibility – Highe...

Security – Physical Protections...

Legionella – Risk Controls...

Broker Bulletin No. 12 – RMP launches new Terrori...

Social Media & Social Responsibility...

Tree Safety – Managing the Risks...

Sign up to receive the latest from rmp

You can opt out of marketing communications at any time by contacting us

Sign up to receive the latest from RMP

For information on how we use your personal data please refer to our UK Privacy Notice | EEA Privacy Notice.

You can opt out of marketing communications at any time by contacting us

RMP

  • Classes of insurance
  • Resources
  • Why RMP
  • Insights
  • Get in touch

Sectors

  • Local government
  • Police
  • Fire services
  • Education institutions

Legal

  • Complaints
  • UK Privacy Notice
  • EEA Privacy Notice
  • Cookie policy
  • Terms and conditions
  • Lloyd’s Brexit Transfer

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

© Risk Management Partners Ltd All rights reserved. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority number 313119. Registered in England number 2989025. The Walbrook Building, 25 Walbrook, London, EC4N 8AW