In accordance with the latest UK government guidelines, all RMP colleagues are now working from home until further notice. Despite not being able to meet with you in person, we are very much open for business and you can reach all our teams by phone, email or social media as we continue our mission to deliver the best service possible for you and all of our clients.
Thank you for your understanding and support as we do our bit to help mitigate the risks associated with COVID-19 in these extraordinary times.
Take care and stay safe from all at RMP

rmp-logormp-logormp-logormp-logo
  • Why RMP
  • Who we work with
  • Resources
  • Insights
  • People
  • Get in touch
  • RMP Europe
Published by Risk Management Partners on March 19, 2021
Categories
  • Casualty
  • Local government
  • Resources
  • Risk Control
Tags
  • Casualty
  • Motor

Taking Pride in Zebra Crossings

Home > Taking Pride in Zebra Crossings

Overview

According to the BBC, homophobic hate crimes in London increased by 55% between 2015 and 2019, with 3,111 hate crimes based upon sexual orientation recorded for London in the twelve months to October 2019.

If we then consider Stonewall’s estimation that four in five anti-LGBT+ hate crimes and incidents go unreported then the true reality for LGBT+ people is even more challenging than the official statistics may suggest.

It may be correct that significant progress has been made within the UK over the past two decades in addressing anti- LGBT+ discrimination and bullying, however, the rather sobering statistics presented suggest that there is still a long way to go.

Committing to the cause

Organisations around the world have found many ways to demonstrate their commitment to inclusiveness and the LGBT+ cause, including:

  • Taking part in local Pride parades and LGBT+ events throughout the year
  • Giving LGBT+ employees a platform to share their stories with the broader workforce
  • Highlighting the accomplishments of LGBT+ employees
  • Including Pride colours in organisational branding
  • Ensuring strong LGBT+ representation on management teams
  • Displaying the Pride colours in social and public-facing areas

A method that some Local Authorities have chosen to adopt to visibly demonstrate their commitment to inclusiveness is through the repainting of zebra crossings in the rainbow colours of the Pride Flag or Progress Pride Flag. The Progress Pride Flag also includes black and brown stripes to represent the marginalised LGBT+ communities of colour, along with the colours pink, light blue and white, which are used on the Trans Pride Flag.

A quick internet search can identify a rising number of these initiatives being implemented globally, including across the UK. Some of these initiatives install temporary colour schemes to celebrate the annual Pride Month, whereas others are more permanent in nature.

Promoting LGBT+ equality and inclusiveness is without doubt the responsibility of every person and every organisation. However, this guidance note seeks to present factors for consideration to any Local Authority currently contemplating the installation of zebra crossings in the rainbow colours of the Pride flag or one of the many variations.

Regulation

One of the principal regulations to consider in respect of the installation of zebra crossings on the public highway is The Zebra, Pelican and Puffin Pedestrian Crossings Regulations and General Directions 1997 (the Regulations).

In summary, the Regulations seek to prescribe standards for the construction and use of road crossings within the UK, specifying standards for traffic and warning signs, road markings, crossing dimensions, lighting and the behaviours of both motorists and pedestrians when approaching or using a crossing.

For example, Regulation 25 states: “Every pedestrian, if he is on the carriageway within the limits of a Zebra crossing, which is not for the time being controlled by a constable in uniform or traffic warden, before any part of a vehicle has entered those limits, shall have precedence within those limits over that vehicle and the driver of the vehicle shall accord such precedence to any such pedestrian.”

This point is endorsed within the Highway Code which states that motorists “MUST give way when a pedestrian has moved onto a crossing.”

Of course, for a driver to give way in accordance with expectations, they must first be paying attention, recognise that they are approaching a designated crossing and also identify pedestrians who are either exhibiting an intention to use the crossing or who are indeed in the act of using it.

Sadly, there are still a high number of road traffic collisions involving pedestrians and vehicles on the UK’s roads.

According to statistics published by the Department of Transport there were 12,972 reported casualties associated with pedestrians being struck by vehicles in the UK in 2019. Of these incidents, there were 5,814 serious injuries and 470 fatalities.

Within the aforementioned Regulations, ‘Schedule 1 Part 2 Road Markings 6 (a)’ states: “within the limits of a Zebra crossing the carriageway shall be marked with a series of alternate black and white stripes…of the size and type, and generally in the manner, shown in the diagram at the end of this Part of this Schedule.”

‘Schedule 1 Part 2 Limits of the crossing 8 (1)’ seemingly provides some limited variability in construction by stating: “If it provides a reasonable contrast with the white stripes, the colour of the surface of the carriageway may be used to indicate the stripes shown coloured black in the diagram.”

No other variability in construction is permitted within the Regulations.

Other regulations relevant to the design and installation of road crossings include The Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2016 which prescribe the designs and conditions of use for traffic signs, including road markings, traffic signals and pedestrian, cycle and equestrian crossings used on or near roads.

‘Local Transport Note 2/95 The Design of Pedestrian Crossings’ recommends the practices to be followed when planning, designing and installing at-grade pedestrian crossings.

Behavioural Factors

As well compliance with the prescribed regulatory standards for zebra crossings highlighted above, there are other behavioural risk factors which Local Authorities should assess as part of their deliberations.

One of the key benefits of a regulated approach to highways infrastructure (including road markings and road signs) is the relative ease at which they can be identified and interpreted, with the intention of creating a consistency in the behaviours of both motorists and pedestrians and the maintenance of high standards of safety.

In respect of the installation of Pride zebra crossings, additional behavioural factors may include:

Ambiguity – could a colour scheme which does not meet the normal expectations of either pedestrians or motorists lead to confusion as to whether the installation is a legal road crossing?

Recognition – how will a Pride colour scheme affect the ability of colour-blind motorists and pedestrians to recognise and respond to the road crossing?

Distraction – could a Pride colour scheme provide distraction to either motorists or pedestrians?

Health – could a non-compliant colour scheme cause confusion or other difficulties for people with certain health conditions such as dementia?

Behavioural factors are an important consideration in the context of established standards designed to protect the safety of motorists and pedestrians, particularly if changes are implemented which may maintain the potential to increase the risk of a road traffic collision.

Conclusion

Despite the progress that has been made over the past two decades, there is little doubt that more needs to be done to promote LGBT+ equality and inclusiveness.

Many Local Authorities are very much at the forefront of initiatives to address the challenges that people in the LGBT+ community face, and this paper in no way seeks to diminish the fantastic efforts that these organisations have made or their continuing commitment to a very worthy cause.

However, when considering the many initiatives that organisations have adopted to further the LGBT+ cause, the installation of zebra crossings in the colours of the Pride Flag or any of its variations does potentially introduce an enhanced risk to the organisation and to road users.

Local Authorities need to consider the legal, financial and reputational implications of installing road crossings which may directly contravene relevant highway regulations and which may also, in some eyes, be considered to increase the risks to pedestrian and motorist safety which is already significant at these crossings.

How can we help you?

For more advice on how we can help lower the cost of your risk, please email contact@rmpartners.co.uk

Unsubscribe

You can opt out of marketing communications at any time by contacting us.

Download Resource

Download the Taking Pride in Zebra Crossings PDF

Related Resources

Security – Intruder Alarms...

Flammable Liquids...

Free Running...

Arson Control...

Tree root claims...

Cycling to and at work...

Aggregate stop loss protection...

Risk Assessment – Suitable and Sufficient...

Maintaining Health and Wellbeing during COVID-19...

IOSH Managing Safely Virtual Courses – June &...

Volunteers – Risk Management Guidance...

Social Care Resilience...

Cycling Events...

Lighting for Car Parks...

Parkruns...

IOSH Managing Safely Virtual Courses – May &...

Dogs in Schools...

IOSH Safety for Executives & Directors (SfED) Virt...

Essentials of Enterprise Risk Management – IRM Ac...

IOSH Managing Safely Virtual Courses – February &...

Ice on the Road...

Blue Light Trauma Awareness and Management...

Competency of Structures Inspectors...

Bite Size Virtual Training Programme – Casualty R...

Bite Size Virtual Training Programme – HE HDI Cas...

Bite Size Virtual Training Programme – EL & ...

Risk Control Refuse Booklet...

Bite Size Virtual Training Programme – Fleet ...

COVID-19 Risk Assessment Guidance – Offices...

Lanyards While Driving...

COVID-19 Risk Management Checklist – Offices...

Fraud...

COVID-19 – Returning to the Workplace...

COVID-19 Risk Management Checklist – Working in or from...

COVID-19 – Returning to the Workplace – Leg...

COVID-19 Risk Management Guidance – Education Settings...

Managing Risks associated with Swimming Pools in Educat...

Managing risks associated with online vehicle booking s...

Firework Risk Management Questionnaire...

The Ups and Downs of Trampoline Parks...

County Lines Drug Running...

Risks in Outsourcing...

Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)...

Sandwich Panels...

E-Scooters...

Ergonomics and Display Screen Equipment Use...

W-8BEN-E – FATCA AIG Europe Limited...

Portable and Transportable Space Heaters...

Stress...

Skateparks – A Guide for Local Authorities...

RMP Tenders – Information Required for Quotations...

Police Motor Fleets...

FM-200...

Home Food Preparation for Schools...

Metal Halide Lighting...

Managing Drivers with Diabetes...

Ash Dieback...

Inergen...

Private Fire Hydrants...

Managing Risks associated with Grey Fleet Vehicles...

Play – The Universal Language of Children...

Homeworking...

Stress Risk Management for Emergency Services...

Well Managed Highways Infrastructure Code of Practice...

Stress Risk Management...

W-8BEN-E – Underwriters at Lloyd’s London...

W-8IMY – FATCA Risk Management Partners Limited...

Highways Competency Framework...

Dementia Awareness for Managers of Drivers...

Electrical Fires – fixed electrical installations...

Managing Risks associated with Hand Arm Vibration Syndr...

Children and young people within a Blue Light workplace...

Cyber Attacks...

Cyber risk at a glance...

Automated & Electric Vehicles Briefing 2020...

W-8BEN-E – FATCA MS Amlin AG...

Keyless Vehicle Entry Systems – Relay Theft...

Winter Weather Precautions...

Fire Safety – Flammable Gases...

Argonite...

Security – Metal Theft...

Smoking in the workplace...

Fireworks – Planning a safe display...

W-8BEN-E – FATCA HSB Engineering Insurance Limite...

Control of Contractors...

Electrical Fires – Portable Electrical Appliances...

FISP Permit...

Motor Vehicle Insurance – Use by volunteers of th...

Novec 1230...

Risk Management Health Check...

W-8BEN-E – FATCA Ecclesiastical Insurance Office ...

The viability of care homes...

Broker Bulletin No. 2 – Local Pension Boards ...

W-8BEN-E – FATCA Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Compan...

Broker Bulletin No. 3 – Insurance Act 2015...

Kitchen Fires...

Security – Manned Guarding Services...

Unwanted Fire Signals...

Broker Bulletin No. 1 – Defibrillators...

W-8BEN-E – FATCA Starr International (Europe) Lim...

Broker Bulletin No. 5 – Employees Own Vehicles &#...

Claims Handlers (Auditing)...

Inflatable Structures...

Fire Brigade Strike...

Misfuelling a Vehicle...

Freezers and Fridges...

Unstaffed Extended Opening Hours...

Highways – Responding to the Crisis...

Broker Bulletin No. 13 – Regional Adoption Agenci...

Security – Understanding the Risk...

Drones and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles...

Security – CCTV...

Children’s Trusts...

Heating up our Highways...

Risk Management for Public Events...

Unoccupied Premises...

W-8BEN-E – FATCA QBE Insurance (Europe) Limited...

Fork-Lift Trucks...

Hot Work – Understanding the Risks...

Broker Bulletin No. 4 – Contract Works Cover ...

Waste Collection and Culture Risk Management...

Cyber Risk Healthcheck...

Combined Liability – Decision Tree and Treatment ...

Proper Footwear for the Job...

Broker Bulletin No. 8 – Police Risks – Dete...

Green Matters...

Project Planning...

Contract Works Insurance...

How an underwriter sets a premium...

Sprinkler Impairments...

Time for a Check Up...

Environmental Risk Management...

Refuse Collection Operations Risk Management – Safety C...

Storage Fires...

Gaseous Fire Suppression System...

Preventing slips on snow and ice...

Modular Construction on Educational Sites...

Automatic Sprinklers...

Thermography...

Authority Business – Using Your Own Vehicle...

Civil Unrest...

Inland Open Water – Risk Management Guidance...

How to complete your renewal questionnaire...

Allergies & Risk of Anaphylaxis in Schools...

Automatic Fire Detection...

Controlling the casualty risks associated with unmanned...

Broker Bulletin No. 7 – POLICE Risks – Memo...

Lightning Protection...

Security – Computer Equipment Protection...

Security – Money...

Storage of Hazardous Substances in Educational Establis...

Broker Bulletin No. 9 – Police Risks – Nati...

Transient Overvoltage Protection...

Broker Bulletin No. 11 – New PL & EL Policy ...

Shared Services – where are we now...

Preventing & Controlling Unauthorised Access to Ro...

Small events risk management...

Housing Fire Risk Management...

Arson Control...

Automatic Sprinkler Systems – Winter Precautions...

Social Media & Social Responsibility – Highe...

Security – Physical Protections...

Legionella – Risk Controls...

Broker Bulletin No. 12 – RMP launches new Terrori...

Social Media & Social Responsibility...

Tree Safety – Managing the Risks...

Sign up to receive the latest from rmp

You can opt out of marketing communications at any time by contacting us

Sign up to receive the latest from RMP

For information on how we use your personal data please refer to our UK Privacy Notice | EEA Privacy Notice.

You can opt out of marketing communications at any time by contacting us

RMP

  • Classes of insurance
  • Resources
  • Why RMP
  • Insights
  • Get in touch

Sectors

  • Local government
  • Police
  • Fire services
  • Education institutions

Legal

  • Complaints
  • UK Privacy Notice
  • EEA Privacy Notice
  • Cookie policy
  • Terms and conditions
  • Lloyd’s Brexit Transfer

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

© Risk Management Partners Ltd All rights reserved. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority number 313119. Registered in England number 2989025. The Walbrook Building, 25 Walbrook, London, EC4N 8AW